R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 2, 2016·No. 48 WAL 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT

RAHEEM MUHAMMAD, : No. 48 WAL 2016 :

Petitioner :

: Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. :

: :

DAVID A. NORRIS; CARL HOFFIELD; : DAVID CURLEY; RAYMOND URBASH; D : AND D AUTO SALVAGE YARDS; TROY : HILL GARAGE; ALL FOREIGN AUTO : PARTS; WEST PENN MOTOR CLUB; : AAA OF PHILADELPHIA, : PENNSYLVANIA: AUTOMOBILE : ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA; : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : TRANSPORTATION AND THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, :

:

Respondents :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.

Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris, (Pa. 2016).

R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris (R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.