R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris
This text of R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris (R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
RAHEEM MUHAMMAD, : No. 48 WAL 2016 : Petitioner : : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court v. : : : DAVID A. NORRIS; CARL HOFFIELD; : DAVID CURLEY; RAYMOND URBASH; D : AND D AUTO SALVAGE YARDS; TROY : HILL GARAGE; ALL FOREIGN AUTO : PARTS; WEST PENN MOTOR CLUB; : AAA OF PHILADELPHIA, : PENNSYLVANIA: AUTOMOBILE : ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA; : PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF : TRANSPORTATION AND THE : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
DENIED.
Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
R. Muhammad, Pet v. David A. Norris, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-muhammad-pet-v-david-a-norris-pa-2016.