R. L. Luckett v. Joe Spivy, Etc., Marcus Gordon, Etc., and Thomas D. Lee, Etc., No. 73-3147 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409

490 F.2d 87
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 28, 1974
Docket87
StatusPublished

This text of 490 F.2d 87 (R. L. Luckett v. Joe Spivy, Etc., Marcus Gordon, Etc., and Thomas D. Lee, Etc., No. 73-3147 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. L. Luckett v. Joe Spivy, Etc., Marcus Gordon, Etc., and Thomas D. Lee, Etc., No. 73-3147 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir., See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. Of New York, 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, 490 F.2d 87 (5th Cir. 1974).

Opinion

490 F.2d 87

R. L. LUCKETT, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Joe SPIVY, etc., et al., Defendants, Marcus Gordon, etc.,
and Thomas D. Lee, etc., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 73-3147 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir., see Isbell Enterprises, Inc.
v.
Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431
F.2d 409.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Feb. 28, 1974.

John L. Walker, Hermel Johnson, Jackson, Miss., Lewis Myers, Jr., Oxford, Miss., for plaintiff-appellant.

A. F. Summer, Atty. Gen., William A. Allain, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Marshall Lusk, Jr., P. Roger Googe, Jr., Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Jackson, Miss., for defendants-appellees.

Roy Noble Lee, Forest, Miss., for Derrick, Harrell, Spivy.

Travis Buckley, Laurel, Miss., for Derrick, Western Sur.

Before BELL, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The entry of judgment in the within matter adjudicated the liabilities of fewer than all of the parties in and to the litigation. There has been no entry of final judgment by the district court upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay as is required by Rule 54(b), F.R.Civ.Procedure. Hence, the judgment lacks the requisite finality to be appealable within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. 1291. International Harvester Credit Corporation v. Belding, 5 Cir., 1972, 462 F.2d 624; Bailey v. Rowan Drilling Company, 5 Cir., 1971, 441 F.2d 57; Cook v. Eizenman, 5 Cir., 1963, 312 F.2d 134.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
490 F.2d 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-l-luckett-v-joe-spivy-etc-marcus-gordon-etc-and-thomas-d-lee-ca5-1974.