R. L. Knighten v. Century Dodge, Inc. And Chrysler Credit Corporation

607 F.2d 1096, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10032
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedDecember 3, 1979
Docket78-1951
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 607 F.2d 1096 (R. L. Knighten v. Century Dodge, Inc. And Chrysler Credit Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. L. Knighten v. Century Dodge, Inc. And Chrysler Credit Corporation, 607 F.2d 1096, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10032 (5th Cir. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

R. L. Knighten filed suit against Century Dodge, Inc. and Chrysler Credit Corp. in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia to recover statutory penalties and attorney’s fees for alleged violations of the Truth in Lending Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1601 et seq., and Regulation Z promulgated thereunder. 12 C.F.R. § 226.1 et seq. The district court entered judgment in favor of the defendants. We affirm.

*1097 Appellant Knighten purchased an automobile from Century Dodge under a retail installment contract. The disclosure statement provided by Century Dodge listed an $8.50 charge for “Tag/Title/Regis.” Knighten argues that the fees which were included in this charge were not “individually itemized” in accordance with the requirements imposed by Regulation Z. We disagree with this contention. Our reasons are adequately set out in the decision we have this day rendered in Downey v. Whaley-Lamb Ford Sales, Inc., 607 F.2d 1093 (oral argument heard Oct. 15, 1979).

Knighten also objects to the disclosure by Century Dodge of a $10.00 “documentary fee” under the heading, “Other Charges.” This method of disclosure complies with § 226.8(c)(4) of Regulation Z and was approved in Meyers v. Clearview Dodge Sales, Inc., 539 F.2d 511 (5th Cir. 1976). We also reject Knighten’s assertion that the components of the documentary fee should have been individually itemized. The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ferris v. Chrysler Credit Corp.
764 F.2d 1475 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
In The Matter Of James W. Ferris, Jr.
764 F.2d 1475 (Eleventh Circuit, 1985)
Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Ferris (In re Ferris)
42 B.R. 374 (S.D. Georgia, 1984)
Donald G. Wallace v. Brownell Pontiac-Gmc Company, Inc.
703 F.2d 525 (Eleventh Circuit, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
607 F.2d 1096, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 10032, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-l-knighten-v-century-dodge-inc-and-chrysler-credit-corporation-ca5-1979.