R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Jimmie Lee Brown, etc.

133 So. 3d 931, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 96, 2014 WL 763139, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 863
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 27, 2014·No. SC11-2201·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. Brown, 70 So.3d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. Upon further consideration, we have determined that we should exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss this review proceeding.

No motion for rehearing will be entertained by the Court. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.330(d)(2).

It is so ordered.

POLSTON, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, LABARGA, and PERRY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Jimmie Lee Brown, etc., 133 So. 3d 931, 39 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 96, 2014 WL 763139, 2014 Fla. LEXIS 863 (Fla. 2014).

133 So. 3d 931 (R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Jimmie Lee Brown, etc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Theresa Graham v. R.J Reynolds Tobacco Company
857 F.3d 1169 (Eleventh Circuit, 2017)