R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Janice L. Sikes, as Personal etc.

• Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida
• Decided: July 30, 2014
• Docket: 13-3183
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

R. J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO COMPANY, FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED Appellant, CASE NO. 1D13-3183 v.

JANICE L. SIKES, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE ESTATE OF JIMMIE WAYNE SIKES,

Appellee.

_____________________________/

Opinion filed July 9, 2014.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Russell L. Healey, Judge.

Meir Feder and Charles R. A. Morse of Jones Day, New York, New York, Robert B. Parrish, David C. Reeves, and Jeffrey A. Yarbrough of Moseley, Prichard, Parrish of Knight & Jones, Jacksonville. Stephanie E. Parker, John F. Yarber, and John M. Walker of Jones Day, Atlanta. Kevin D. Boyce, and Edward Carter of Jones Day, Cleveland, Ohio, Gregory G. Katsas of Jones Day, Washington, DC., for Appellant.

John S. Kalil, Jacksonville, and John S. Mills and Courtney Brewer of The Mills Firm, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM.

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company appeals the final judgment for plaintiff

Janice L. Sikes, the personal representative of the estate of Jimmie Wayne Sikes.

We affirm on all issues. But following R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Hiott,

129 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014), we certify conflict with the Fourth District’s

decision in Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Hess, 95 So. 3d 254 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012),

rev. denied, 117 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 2013), on the issue of whether the trial court

reversibly erred by denying Reynolds’ requested jury instruction on the statute of

repose, section 95.031(2), Florida Statutes.

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

VAN NORTWICK, MARSTILLER, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., CONCUR.