R. J. Rausaw and Morris J. Merritt v. United States
376 F.2d 154, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1978, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6516
Opinion
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the filing of an excise tax return reflecting liability for admission taxes was sufficient to constitute a cabaret tax return in order to start the statute of limitations to run. It would serve no useful purpose for us to further canvass the issue which the district judge, in a thoroughgoing opinion reported at 253 F.Supp. 528, correctly determined against the taxpayer.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
R. J. Rausaw and Morris J. Merritt v. United States, 376 F.2d 154, 19 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1978, 1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 6516 (5th Cir. 1967).
376 F.2d 154 (R. J. Rausaw and Morris J. Merritt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. L. H.
392 So. 2d 294 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)