R. I. Perkins Horse Shoe Co. v. Dwyer

36 A. 1134, 19 R.I. 488, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 113
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedMay 28, 1896
DocketMiscellaneous Petitions, No. 2402.
StatusPublished

This text of 36 A. 1134 (R. I. Perkins Horse Shoe Co. v. Dwyer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. I. Perkins Horse Shoe Co. v. Dwyer, 36 A. 1134, 19 R.I. 488, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 113 (R.I. 1896).

Opinion

The testimony shows that the petitioners are the owners and occupants of a greater part of the land situated within two hundred feet of the building for the sale in which of pure, spirituous, intoxicating and malt liquors, application for a license was made; and the record shows that a remonstrance signed by the petitioners was presented to the re *489 spondents, who are the Board of License Commissioners, before the granting of the license. They therefore had no jurisdiction to grant the license. General Laws, R. I. cap. 102, § 2.

Edwards & Angelí, for petitioner. Charles E. Gorman, for respondents.

An order may be entered to quash the proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 A. 1134, 19 R.I. 488, 1896 R.I. LEXIS 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-i-perkins-horse-shoe-co-v-dwyer-ri-1896.