R. Hassell Holding Company, Inc., R. Hassell & Company, Inc., R. Hassell Builders, Inc., and Royce Hassell, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Hassell Construction Corporation, Inc. v. Coats, Rose, Ryman & Lee, P.C., Richard L. Rose, Patrick Gaas, Heather Asselin and David Lynch

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 10, 2018
Docket14-17-00208-CV
StatusPublished

This text of R. Hassell Holding Company, Inc., R. Hassell & Company, Inc., R. Hassell Builders, Inc., and Royce Hassell, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Hassell Construction Corporation, Inc. v. Coats, Rose, Ryman & Lee, P.C., Richard L. Rose, Patrick Gaas, Heather Asselin and David Lynch (R. Hassell Holding Company, Inc., R. Hassell & Company, Inc., R. Hassell Builders, Inc., and Royce Hassell, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Hassell Construction Corporation, Inc. v. Coats, Rose, Ryman & Lee, P.C., Richard L. Rose, Patrick Gaas, Heather Asselin and David Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. Hassell Holding Company, Inc., R. Hassell & Company, Inc., R. Hassell Builders, Inc., and Royce Hassell, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Hassell Construction Corporation, Inc. v. Coats, Rose, Ryman & Lee, P.C., Richard L. Rose, Patrick Gaas, Heather Asselin and David Lynch, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

Abatement Order filed July 10, 2018

In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-17-00208-CV ____________

R. HASSELL HOLDING COMPANY, INC., R. HASSELL & COMPANY, INC., R. HASSELL BUILDERS, INC., AND ROYCE HASSELL, INDIVIDUALLY AND DERIVATIVELY ON BEHALF OF HASSELL CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, INC., Appellants

V.

COATS, ROSE, RYMAN & LEE, P.C., RICHARD L. ROSE, PATRICK GAAS, HEATHER ASSELIN, AND DAVID LYNCH, Appellees

On Appeal from the 234th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-29275

ABATEMENT ORDER On July 5, 2018, appellants notified this court that they have petitioned for voluntary bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas as follows:

1. No. 18-33541, In re R. Hassell Holding Co., Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex.). 2. No. 18-33608, In re R. Hassell & Co., Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)

3. No. 18-33619, In re R. Hassell Builders, Inc. (Bankr. S.D. Tex.)

A bankruptcy suspends the appeal from the date when the bankruptcy petition is filed until the appellate court reinstates the appeal in accordance with federal law. Tex. R. App. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal abated.

When a case has been suspended by a bankruptcy filing, a party may move the appellate court to reinstate the appeal if permitted by federal law or the bankruptcy court. Tex. R. App. P. 8.3. If the bankruptcy court has lifted or terminated the stay, a certified copy of the order must be attached to the motion. Id. A party filing a motion to reinstate shall specify what further action, if any, is required from this court when the appeal is reinstated. See Tex. R. App. P. 10.1(a).

For administrative purposes only, and without surrendering jurisdiction, the appeal is abated and treated as a closed case until further order of this court.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
R. Hassell Holding Company, Inc., R. Hassell & Company, Inc., R. Hassell Builders, Inc., and Royce Hassell, Individually and Derivatively on Behalf of Hassell Construction Corporation, Inc. v. Coats, Rose, Ryman & Lee, P.C., Richard L. Rose, Patrick Gaas, Heather Asselin and David Lynch, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-hassell-holding-company-inc-r-hassell-company-inc-r-hassell-texapp-2018.