R. H. Elsbach & Co. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 384
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 30, 1960
DocketNo. 64928; protests 59/6366, etc. (San Francisco)
StatusPublished

This text of 45 Cust. Ct. 384 (R. H. Elsbach & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. H. Elsbach & Co. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 384 (cusc 1960).

Opinion

[385]*385Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe items marked “A” consist of glass jars, produced by automatic machine, fitted with ground-glass stoppers, and ordinarily used to hold and transport confectionery, which confectionery is dutiable at 14 percent under paragraph 506, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), the items were held dutiable at the said current rate of 14 percent for the contents of said glass jars under paragraph 218(e), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), by virtue of paragraph 218(h) of the tariff act. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of glass jars, filled with and used as containers of soap “marbles,” produced otherwise than by automatic machine, fitted with or designed for use with ground-glass stoppers, were held dutiable at 37% percent under paragraph 218(e), as modified by T.D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51898), and paragraph 218(h) of the tariff act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
45 Cust. Ct. 384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-h-elsbach-co-v-united-states-cusc-1960.