R. F. Lowery's DeBevois Corp. v. Leon D. DeMatteis & Sons, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

R. F. Lowery's DeBevois Corp. v. Leon D. DeMatteis & Sons, Inc.

135 A.D.2d 469, 522 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52425

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 17, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 135 A.D.2d 469 (R. F. Lowery's DeBevois Corp. v. Leon D. DeMatteis & Sons, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R. F. Lowery's DeBevois Corp. v. Leon D. DeMatteis & Sons, Inc., 135 A.D.2d 469, 522 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52425 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered March 5, 1987, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss to the extent of precluding plaintiff from testifying at trial regarding certain documents which plaintiff failed to produce as required by a stipulation on the ground that the documents were not in plaintiff’s possession, affirmed, without costs.

We interpret the order of the I. A. S. court as precluding the plaintiff from offering any evidence with regard to documents that it was ordered to produce and failed to produce on their claim that the documents were not in their possession. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Myriam J. Altman, J.), entered March 5, 1987, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss to the extent of precluding plaintiff from testifying at trial regarding certain documents which plaintiff failed to produce as required by a stipulation on the ground that the documents were not in plaintiff’s possession, affirmed, without costs.

We interpret the order of the I. A. S. court as precluding the plaintiff from offering any evidence with regard to documents that it was ordered to produce and failed to produce on their claim that the documents were not in their possession. Concur — Sandler, J. P., Carro, Milonas, Rosenberger and Wallach, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 A.D.2d 469, 522 N.Y.S.2d 447, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-f-lowerys-debevois-corp-v-leon-d-dematteis-sons-inc-nyappdiv-1987.