R & C Corp. v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

R & C Corp. v. Board of Education

50 A.D.2d 943, 377 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12180

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 31, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 50 A.D.2d 943 (R & C Corp. v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R & C Corp. v. Board of Education, 50 A.D.2d 943, 377 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12180 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to (1) restrain respondents from "accepting and/or opening any bids for the performance” of certain construction work and (2) to direct them to enter into contracts with the lowest responsible bidders for such work, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 8, 1975, which denied the application and dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remanded to the respondent Board of Education of the City of New York to consider all bids submitted and to decide which bids, if any, should be rejected. The respondent Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City of New York did not have authority to reject all bids, as the bylaws reserve that right exclusively to the board itself (By-Laws of Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., § 71, subd 2). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to (1) restrain respondents from "accepting and/or opening any bids for the performance” of certain construction work and (2) to direct them to enter into contracts with the lowest responsible bidders for such work, petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered September 8, 1975, which denied the application and dismissed the petition. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remanded to the respondent Board of Education of the City of New York to consider all bids submitted and to decide which bids, if any, should be rejected. The respondent Chancellor of the Board of Education of the City of New York did not have authority to reject all bids, as the bylaws reserve that right exclusively to the board itself (By-Laws of Board of Educ. of City of N.Y., § 71, subd 2). Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

50 A.D.2d 943, 377 N.Y.S.2d 952, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-c-corp-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1975.