R. Beuc Architects, Inc. v. Nemeth

Missouri Court of Appeals

R. Beuc Architects, Inc. v. Nemeth

867 S.W.2d 717, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 2032, 1993 WL 541327

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 28, 1993·No. No. 63159·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Richard and Betty Nemeth, appeal from the trial court’s order entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting respondent’s, R. Beuc Architects, Inc.’s, motion for new trial. We affirm.

The action of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. In addition, no error of law appears. As we find an opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Richard and Betty Nemeth, appeal from the trial court’s order entered in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County granting respondent’s, R. Beuc Architects, Inc.’s, motion for new trial. We affirm.

The action of the trial court is supported by substantial evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence. In addition, no error of law appears. As we find an opinion would have no precedential value, we affirm the trial court’s order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

R. Beuc Architects, Inc. v. Nemeth, 867 S.W.2d 717, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 2032, 1993 WL 541327 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

867 S.W.2d 717 (R. Beuc Architects, Inc. v. Nemeth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.