Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/R. Bertil Peterson v. State

R. Bertil Peterson v. State

90 A.D.3d 1055, 934 N.Y.2d 837
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 27, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 A.D.3d 1055 (R. Bertil Peterson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. Bertil Peterson v. State, 90 A.D.3d 1055, 934 N.Y.2d 837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

The determination that the petitioner violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1225-c is supported by substantial evidence. The petitioner’s challenge to the administrative determination rests upon an issue of credibility which was primarily for the fact-finder to resolve, and we see no basis to overturn the factfinder’s determination (see Matter of Hildreth v New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs. Appeals Bd., 83 AD3d 838 [2011]). Dillon, J.P., Balkin, Leventhal and Chambers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Arken v. New York City Dept. of Fin.
127 A.D.3d 853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Matter of Snitow v. New York State Dept. of Motor Vehs.
121 A.D.3d 1008 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Matter of Matievskaya v. State of New York Dept. of Motor Vehicles
121 A.D.3d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 A.D.3d 1055, 934 N.Y.2d 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-bertil-peterson-v-state-nyappdiv-2011.