R. & B. Realty & Construction Co. v. Jelleme

130 A. 365, 2 N.J. Misc. 356, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 187
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedMay 7, 1924
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 130 A. 365 (R. & B. Realty & Construction Co. v. Jelleme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. & B. Realty & Construction Co. v. Jelleme, 130 A. 365, 2 N.J. Misc. 356, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 187 (N.J. 1924).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not be awarded.

The relator desires- to erect three two-family houses on lands owned by it and situate on Grace terrace, in the city of Passaic, and having complied in every respect with the rules, laws and requirements regulating the construction of said buildings applied to- respondent for a building permit or. permits which was refused upon the ground that the erection of such buildings would be in violation of the zoning ordinance of the city of Passaic.

We think this case is controlled by the rules and principles laid down by Ignaciunas v. Risley, 1 N. J. Adv. R. 1023, and under the authority thereof an alternative writ of mandamus should issue.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yoselowitz v. Peoples Bakery, Inc.
277 N.W. 221 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 A. 365, 2 N.J. Misc. 356, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-b-realty-construction-co-v-jelleme-nj-1924.