R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour
This text of 296 S.E.2d 822 (R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendants have appealed from an order setting aside a judgment and granting a new trial under Rule 60(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. The order entered pursuant to Rule 60(b), setting aside the judgment, is interlocutory and the appeal is premature. Similar to a grant of a 60(b) motion to set aside a default judgment, this order is not appealable as “it does not finally dispose of the case and requires further action by the trial court.” See Shaw v. Pedersen, 53 N.C. App. 796, 798, 281 S.E. 2d 700, 701 (1981), quoting Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 209, 270 S.E. 2d 431, 434 (1980).
Defendants have adequately preserved the question of the appropriateness of the trial court’s order setting aside the judg *539 ment and granting a new trial. That question may be raised, if necessary, upon an appeal from the final judgment following the retrial of plaintiffs original claim on its merits. Accordingly, defendants’ appeal is
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
296 S.E.2d 822, 59 N.C. App. 537, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 3149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-b-deal-construction-co-v-spainhour-ncctapp-1982.