R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour

296 S.E.2d 822, 59 N.C. App. 537, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 3149
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided November 16, 1982·No. 8121SC1293·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

Defendants have appealed from an order setting aside a judgment and granting a new trial under Rule 60(b) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure. The order entered pursuant to Rule 60(b), setting aside the judgment, is interlocutory and the appeal is premature. Similar to a grant of a 60(b) motion to set aside a default judgment, this order is not appealable as “it does not finally dispose of the case and requires further action by the trial court.” See Shaw v. Pedersen, 53 N.C. App. 796, 798, 281 S.E. 2d 700, 701 (1981), quoting Bailey v. Gooding, 301 N.C. 205, 209, 270 S.E. 2d 431, 434 (1980).

Defendants have adequately preserved the question of the appropriateness of the trial court’s order setting aside the judg *539 ment and granting a new trial. That question may be raised, if necessary, upon an appeal from the final judgment following the retrial of plaintiffs original claim on its merits. Accordingly, defendants’ appeal is

Dismissed.

Judges Hedrick and Hill concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour, 296 S.E.2d 822, 59 N.C. App. 537, 1982 N.C. App. LEXIS 3149 (N.C. Ct. App. 1982).

296 S.E.2d 822 (R. B. Deal Construction Co. v. Spainhour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Banner v. Hatcher
477 S.E.2d 249 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)