R. Arion v. J. Salmonsen

CourtMontana Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 25, 2022
DocketOP 22-0583
StatusUnpublished

This text of R. Arion v. J. Salmonsen (R. Arion v. J. Salmonsen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
R. Arion v. J. Salmonsen, (Mo. 2022).

Opinion

10/25/2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: OP 22-0583

OP 22-0583 11;ffirs album

RYAN ARION, OCT 2 5 2022 Bowen Greenwood

Petitioner, OPIGINAI Clark of Supreme Court state of Montana

v. ORDER JIM SALMONSEN, Warden, Montana State Prison.

Respondent.

Representing himself, Ryan Arion has filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, requesting that this Court "inquire into whether the petitioner is unlawfully restrained of his liberty." After correctly citing the habeas corpus statutes, Arion puts forth that his appointed counsel "prejudiced" him because his counsel did not appeal his sentence upon revocation on Arion's request, causing "abandonment of appeal." Arion "implores this Court to reverse the Judgment." Arion challenges his sentence from the Lewis and Clark County District Court. We secured a copy of the judgment, most recently amended in September 2021. Arion pleaded guilty to felony accountability (theft — obtain or exerts unauthorized control over property exceeding $1,500 not exceeding $5,000-2' offense) in April 2021. The District Court committed Arion to the Department of Corrections for a suspended, five-year term. The court ran his sentence consecutively to his prior sentence from Custer County District Court. See Arion v. Salmonsen, No. OP 22-0192, Order (Mont. Jul. 19, 2022). Arion has not presented a prima facie case that he is unlawfully restrained. Miller v. Eleventh Judicial District Ct., 2007 MT 58, ¶ 14, 336 Mont. 207, 154 P.3d 1186. He has not shown how his incarceration is illegal. Section 46-22-101(1), MCA. Moreover, Arion, who appears to be familiar with filing matters in this Court, could have sought and filed a timely appeal on his own behalf last year or sought leave to file an out-of-time appeal. This Court cannot reverse his judgment through a writ of habeas corpus. Arion retains the remedy of seeking relief in the Lewis and Clark County District Court through a petition for postconviction relief. See §§ 46-21-101, through 46-21-203, MCA. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Arion's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy of this Order to counsel of record and to Ryan Arion personally. 4-4-, DATED this e-e3C lay of October, 2022.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Eleventh Judicial District Court
2007 MT 58 (Montana Supreme Court, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
R. Arion v. J. Salmonsen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-arion-v-j-salmonsen-mont-2022.