R. A. Wells Lumber Co. v. City of Chicago
This text of 128 N.E. 592 (R. A. Wells Lumber Co. v. City of Chicago) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court:
On October 9, 1918, appellee brought suit in the superior court of Cook county against the appellant to recover the sum of $3720.44 deposited by him under the terms of an ordinance passed by appellant on the nth day of March, 1912. The ordinance provided for the vacation of a part of Todd street, in the city of Chicago, and is substantially the same as the ordinances considered by this court in Lockwood & Strickland Co. v. City of Chicago, 279 Ill. 445, and Smyth Co. v. City of Chicago, (ante, p. 136.) The ordinance and declaration show that the money in the instant case was, as in the former cases, deposited by the appellee “toward a fund for the payment and satisfaction of any and all claims for damages which may arise from the vacation of said street.” Appellee secured judgment in the trial court for said amount, and on certificate of that court that the validity of an ordinance is involved the cause comes to this court on appeal.
The questions involved in this case have been fully considered in the two cases cited and those cases are controlling here. The judgment, of the superior court of Cook county is therefore affirmed.
Judgment affirmed. .
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
128 N.E. 592, 294 Ill. 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-a-wells-lumber-co-v-city-of-chicago-ill-1920.