R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Fifth Circuit

R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

225 F.2d 837, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4262

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 16, 1955

Docket15330_1

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 225 F.2d 837 (R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

R. A. Haberman, Jr., Independent of the Estate of Elizabeth H. Gravis, Deceased v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 225 F.2d 837, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4262 (5th Cir. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has drawn the Court’s attention to an incorrect statement of fact in the last paragraph of the opinion. It was there stated that the consideration for the annuity was paid by “Mr. Grav-is.” This is consistent with the corrected printed record in the case. However, the original record discloses that the consideration for the annuity was paid by “Mrs. Gravis.” The last paragraph of our original opinion, therefore, becomes inappropriate and inapplicable, and it is stricken.

■ This paragraph having been no part of the ratio decidendi and there being no merit in the motion for rehearing, the same is, therefore, Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant has drawn the Court’s attention to an incorrect statement of fact in the last paragraph of the opinion. It was there stated that the consideration for the annuity was paid by “Mr. Grav-is.” This is consistent with the corrected printed record in the case. However, the original record discloses that the consideration for the annuity was paid by “Mrs. Gravis.” The last paragraph of our original opinion, therefore, becomes inappropriate and inapplicable, and it is stricken.

■ This paragraph having been no part of the ratio decidendi and there being no merit in the motion for rehearing, the same is, therefore, Denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

225 F.2d 837, 1955 U.S. App. LEXIS 4262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-a-haberman-jr-independent-of-the-estate-of-elizabeth-h-gravis-ca5-1955.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack