R-A
This text of 23 I. & N. Dec. 694 (R-A) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Board of Immigration Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 694 (A.G. 2005) Interim Decision #3504
In re R-A-, Respondent Decided by Attorney General January 19, 2005 Decided by Attorney General January 19, 20011 Decided by Board June 11, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals
FOR APPLICANT: Jane B. Kroesche, Esquire, and Karen Musalo, Esquire, San Francisco, California FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel
BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (January 19, 2005) The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for reconsideration following final publication of the proposed rule published at 65 Fed. Reg. 76,588 (Dec. 7, 2000). The BIA should reconsider the decision in light of the final rule.
1 The Attorney General’s January 19, 2001, and the Board’s June 11, 1999, decisions in this case were published as Matter of R-A-, 22 I&N Dec. 906 (A.G. 2001; BIA 1999).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 I. & N. Dec. 694, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/r-a-bia-2005.