R-A

23 I. & N. Dec. 694
Board of Immigration Appeals·Decided July 1, 2005·No. ID 3504·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Cite as 23 I&N Dec. 694 (A.G. 2005) Interim Decision #3504

In re R-A-, Respondent

Decided by Attorney General January 19, 2005 Decided by Attorney General January 19, 20011 Decided by Board June 11, 1999 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals

FOR APPLICANT: Jane B. Kroesche, Esquire, and Karen Musalo, Esquire, San Francisco, California FOR DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY: Joe D. Whitley, General Counsel

BEFORE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (January 19, 2005)

The case is remanded to the Board of Immigration Appeals for reconsideration following final publication of the proposed rule published at 65 Fed. Reg. 76,588 (Dec. 7, 2000). The BIA should reconsider the decision in light of the final rule.

1 The Attorney General’s January 19, 2001, and the Board’s June 11, 1999, decisions in this case were published as Matter of R-A-, 22 I&N Dec. 906 (A.G. 2001; BIA 1999).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

R-A, 23 I. & N. Dec. 694 (bia 2005).

23 I. & N. Dec. 694 (R-A) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

De Pena-Paniagua v. Barr
957 F.3d 88 (First Circuit, 2020)
A-R-C-G
26 I. & N. Dec. 388 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2014)
R-A
24 I. & N. Dec. 629 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 2008)
Hong Ying Gao v. Alberto Gonzales, 1
440 F.3d 62 (Second Circuit, 2006)