Quotron Systems, Inc. v. Irizarry
409 N.E.2d 997, 50 N.Y.2d 926, 431 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2488
Opinion
[927] Motion to amend remittitur denied. No question as to the right of plaintiff to postjudgment interest was considered by this court or affected by its remittitur (see CPLR 5003; Real Property Tax Law, § 726, subd 1, par [a]; subd 2; see, also, Matter of Brodsky v Murphy, 25 NY2d 518, 522, 523). [See 48 NY2d 795.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quotron Systems, Inc. v. Irizarry, 409 N.E.2d 997, 50 N.Y.2d 926, 431 N.Y.S.2d 525, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2488 (N.Y. 1980).
409 N.E.2d 997 (Quotron Systems, Inc. v. Irizarry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of County of Warren
2020 NY Slip Op 2217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)