Quogue Associates v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
This text of 112 A.D.2d 999 (Quogue Associates v. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of respondent New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, dated October 7, 1983, denying petitioner’s application for a permit to construct a single-family house on protected tidal wetlands, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated February 8, 1984, which dismissed the proceeding.
Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Petitioner timely served the Attorney-General with the [1000]*1000notice of petition and petition in this proceeding pursuant to CPLR 7804 (c), but failed to timely serve respondent. The Attorney-General is not a party to this proceeding, but rather the prospective attorney for a party. Thus, petitioner’s timely service upon the Attorney-General did not toll the statutory period of limitations and allow for untimely service of the notice of petition and petition upon the respondent (see, Matter of Cohen v State Tax Commn., 51 AD2d 79; Matter of Upstate Milk Coops, v State of New York Dept. of Agrie. & Mkts, 101 AD2d 940). Mangano, J. P., Brown, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
112 A.D.2d 999, 492 N.Y.S.2d 808, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52209, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quogue-associates-v-new-york-state-department-of-environmental-nyappdiv-1985.