QUIXTAR, INC. v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

QUIXTAR, INC. v. Campbell

680 S.E.2d 661, 298 Ga. App. 617, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2285, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 751

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 30, 2009

DocketA09A0112

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 680 S.E.2d 661 (QUIXTAR, INC. v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

QUIXTAR, INC. v. Campbell, 680 S.E.2d 661, 298 Ga. App. 617, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2285, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 751 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

Barnes, Judge.

Quixtar, Inc., appeals from the order of the White County Superior Court denying its petition to remove under OCGA § 14-2-510 (b) (4), and granting Todd Campbell’s 1 motion for interlocutory injunctive relief. For the reasons stated below, the case is dismissed.

The complaint for declaratory judgment and interlocutory and permanent injunctive relief was filed in the Superior Court of White County. Quixtar thereafter filed a notice of removal to the Superior Court of Fulton County, maintaining that Fulton County was the location of its principal place of business in Georgia. Campbell objected to Quixtar’s notice of removal. The Superior Court of White County denied Quixtar’s notice of removal and granted Campbell’s motion for interlocutory injunction. A notice of appeal was then filed by Quixtar. While the appeal was pending, this Court was notified that the case had been removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.

Pursuant to 28 USC § 1446 (d), jurisdiction of the federal district court attaches when the removal petition is filed. Thus, “[w]hen an action in a State court is removed to a Federal district court, the jurisdiction of the State court is suspended until the case is *618 remanded to the State court, at which time the case resumes the status it occupied at the time of the removal.” Southern Bell Tel. &c. Co. v. Perry, 168 Ga. App. 387, 388 (308 SE2d 848) (1983).

Decided June 30, 2009. Stanley R. Lawson, Alycen A. Moss, for appellant. Smith, Gilliam, Williams & Miles, Steven P. Gilliam, Roger B. Hatcher, Jr., for appellees.

Accordingly, this Court is without jurisdiction unless and until the case is remanded to the state court, and, accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal is moot.

Appeal dismissed.

Miller, C. J., and Andrews, P. J., concur.

1

The appellees are twenty-five former Quixtar independent business owners, and four affiliate businesses (hereinafter “Campbell”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Barnes, Judge.

Quixtar, Inc., appeals from the order of the White County Superior Court denying its petition to remove under OCGA § 14-2-510 (b) (4), and granting Todd Campbell’s 1 motion for interlocutory injunctive relief. For the reasons stated below, the case is dismissed.

The complaint for declaratory judgment and interlocutory and permanent injunctive relief was filed in the Superior Court of White County. Quixtar thereafter filed a notice of removal to the Superior Court of Fulton County, maintaining that Fulton County was the location of its principal place of business in Georgia. Campbell objected to Quixtar’s notice of removal. The Superior Court of White County denied Quixtar’s notice of removal and granted Campbell’s motion for interlocutory injunction. A notice of appeal was then filed by Quixtar. While the appeal was pending, this Court was notified that the case had been removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division.

Pursuant to 28 USC § 1446 (d), jurisdiction of the federal district court attaches when the removal petition is filed. Thus, “[w]hen an action in a State court is removed to a Federal district court, the jurisdiction of the State court is suspended until the case is *618 remanded to the State court, at which time the case resumes the status it occupied at the time of the removal.” Southern Bell Tel. &c. Co. v. Perry, 168 Ga. App. 387, 388 (308 SE2d 848) (1983).

Decided June 30, 2009. Stanley R. Lawson, Alycen A. Moss, for appellant. Smith, Gilliam, Williams & Miles, Steven P. Gilliam, Roger B. Hatcher, Jr., for appellees.

Accordingly, this Court is without jurisdiction unless and until the case is remanded to the state court, and, accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. The appellees’ motion to dismiss the appeal is moot.

Appeal dismissed.

Miller, C. J., and Andrews, P. J., concur.

1

The appellees are twenty-five former Quixtar independent business owners, and four affiliate businesses (hereinafter “Campbell”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

680 S.E.2d 661, 298 Ga. App. 617, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2285, 2009 Ga. App. LEXIS 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quixtar-inc-v-campbell-gactapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack