Quittman v. Village of Chevy Chase

528 F. App'x 376
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 17, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1410
StatusPublished

This text of 528 F. App'x 376 (Quittman v. Village of Chevy Chase) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quittman v. Village of Chevy Chase, 528 F. App'x 376 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth A. Quittman appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion to remand his action to the state court and imposing sanctions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Quittman v. Village of Chevy Chase, No. 8:10-cv-03407-RWT, 2013 WL 791219 (D.Md. July 25, 2011, Feb. 28, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in [377]*377the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
528 F. App'x 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quittman-v-village-of-chevy-chase-ca4-2013.