Quito v. Compania De Vapores Ocean Breeze S.A.

743 So. 2d 1178, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14172, 1999 WL 973586
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 27, 1999
DocketNo. 98-947
StatusPublished

This text of 743 So. 2d 1178 (Quito v. Compania De Vapores Ocean Breeze S.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quito v. Compania De Vapores Ocean Breeze S.A., 743 So. 2d 1178, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14172, 1999 WL 973586 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the jury’s verdict and judgment are fully supported by competent evidence; and that the claimed error was harmless at best. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Stecher v. Pomeroy, 253 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla.1971); Chrysler v. Department of Prof'l Reg., 627 So.2d 31, 34-35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Scurry v. State, 490 So.2d 223, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Arlen House E., Inc. v. Lowenstern, 364 So.2d 87, 88 [1179]*1179(Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We therefore affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

GREEN and SORONDO, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Morse
653 So. 2d 409 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Scurry v. State
490 So. 2d 223 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Chrysler v. DEPT. OF PRO. REGULATION
627 So. 2d 31 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Arlen House East, Inc. v. Lowenstern
364 So. 2d 87 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
743 So. 2d 1178, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14172, 1999 WL 973586, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quito-v-compania-de-vapores-ocean-breeze-sa-fladistctapp-1999.