Quito v. Compania De Vapores Ocean Breeze S.A.

743 So. 2d 1178, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14172, 1999 WL 973586

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Our review of the record leads us to the conclusion that the jury’s verdict and judgment are fully supported by competent evidence; and that the claimed error was harmless at best. See § 59.041, Fla. Stat. (1995); Stecher v. Pomeroy, 253 So.2d 421, 422 (Fla.1971); Chrysler v. Department of Prof'l Reg., 627 So.2d 31, 34-35 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Scurry v. State, 490 So.2d 223, 224 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Arlen House E., Inc. v. Lowenstern, 364 So.2d 87, 88 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). We therefore affirm the judgment under review.

Affirmed.

GREEN and SORONDO, JJ., concur.