Quiroz v. DCT Enterprises of New Mexico, LLC

D. New Mexico

Quiroz v. DCT Enterprises of New Mexico, LLC

DecidedMay 4, 2022

Docket2:21-cv-01197

StatusUnknown

This text of Quiroz v. DCT Enterprises of New Mexico, LLC (Quiroz v. DCT Enterprises of New Mexico, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quiroz v. DCT Enterprises of New Mexico, LLC, (D.N.M. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO SANJUANA QUIROZ, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:21-cv-1197 SMV/KRS DCT ENTERPRISES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC, Defendant. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff initiated this action on December 17, 2021. (Doc. 1). On January 20, 2022, Plaintiff filed a summons indicating Defendant was served on January 12, 2022 and its answer was due February 2, 2022. (Doc. 3). No answer or other responsive pleading has been filed in this case. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the Court to dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003); see also D.N.M. LR- Civ. 41.1 (“A civil action may be dismissed if, for a period of ninety (90) calendar days, no steps are taken to move the case forward.”). More than ninety days have passed since Plaintiff took any step to move this case forward. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before May 16, 2022 Plaintiff must provide the Court with a written explanation showing good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

KEVINR.SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO SANJUANA QUIROZ, Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. No. 2:21-cv-1197 SMV/KRS DCT ENTERPRISES OF NEW MEXICO, LLC, Defendant. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THIS MATTER comes before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff initiated this action on December 17, 2021. (Doc. 1). On January 20, 2022, Plaintiff filed a summons indicating Defendant was served on January 12, 2022 and its answer was due February 2, 2022. (Doc. 3). No answer or other responsive pleading has been filed in this case. Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure authorizes the Court to dismiss an action sua sponte for failure to prosecute. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n.3 (10th Cir. 2003); see also D.N.M. LR- Civ. 41.1 (“A civil action may be dismissed if, for a period of ninety (90) calendar days, no steps are taken to move the case forward.”). More than ninety days have passed since Plaintiff took any step to move this case forward. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that on or before May 16, 2022 Plaintiff must provide the Court with a written explanation showing good cause why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

KEVINR.SWEAZEA UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Quiroz v. DCT Enterprises of New Mexico, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quiroz-v-dct-enterprises-of-new-mexico-llc-nmd-2022.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack