Quiroga, Ramon Alberto Gonzalez AKA Gonzalez, Ramon Alberto

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 29, 2020
DocketWR-90,560-01
StatusPublished

This text of Quiroga, Ramon Alberto Gonzalez AKA Gonzalez, Ramon Alberto (Quiroga, Ramon Alberto Gonzalez AKA Gonzalez, Ramon Alberto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quiroga, Ramon Alberto Gonzalez AKA Gonzalez, Ramon Alberto, (Tex. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-90,560-01

EX PARTE RAMON ALBERTO GONZALEZ QUIROGA, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2016-DCR-00239-D IN THE 103RD DISTRICT COURT FROM CAMERON COUNTY

Per curiam.

ORDER

Applicant was convicted of capital murder and sentenced to life imprisonment. The

Thirteenth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Quiroga v. State, No. 13-16-00470-CR (Tex.

App.—Corpus Christi Dec. 21, 2017) (not designated for publication). Applicant filed this

application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk forwarded

it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.

Applicant contends, among other things, that although he maintained he was innocent, trial

counsel ignored his wishes and conceded that he was guilty of robbery or should be punished as a

thief. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. McCoy v. Louisiana, 138

S. Ct. 1500 (2018). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate 2

forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order trial

counsel to respond to the above claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use any means

set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether

Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the trial court

shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC . art. 26.04. If

counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of counsel’s

name.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether trial counsel

violated Applicant’s right to determine the objective of his defense by ignoring Applicant’s desire

to maintain his innocence and conceding that he was guilty of robbery or should be punished as a

thief. The trial court may make any other findings and conclusions that it deems appropriate in

response to Applicant’s claims.

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from

the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s

findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,

affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from

hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested

by the trial court and obtained from this Court.

Filed: January 29, 2020 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCoy v. Louisiana
584 U.S. 414 (Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Quiroga, Ramon Alberto Gonzalez AKA Gonzalez, Ramon Alberto, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quiroga-ramon-alberto-gonzalez-aka-gonzalez-ramon-alberto-texcrimapp-2020.