Quirk v. Sherry

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quirk v. Sherry

238 A.D.2d 274, 656 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4286

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 24, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 238 A.D.2d 274 (Quirk v. Sherry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quirk v. Sherry, 238 A.D.2d 274, 656 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4286 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.), entered June 13, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by defendants’ brief, denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first cause of action alleging a discrimination claim under section 8-502 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York for failing to serve a copy of the complaint on the New York City Corporation Counsel and Commission on Human Rights prior to filing, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We adhere to our decision in Bernstein v 1995 Assocs. (217 AD2d 512), in which we rejected the contentions made by defendants herein. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Norman Ryp, J.), entered June 13, 1996, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by defendants’ brief, denied defendants’ cross motion to dismiss plaintiff’s first cause of action alleging a discrimination claim under section 8-502 of the Administrative Code of the City of New York for failing to serve a copy of the complaint on the New York City Corporation Counsel and Commission on Human Rights prior to filing, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

We adhere to our decision in Bernstein v 1995 Assocs. (217 AD2d 512), in which we rejected the contentions made by defendants herein. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Ellerin, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

238 A.D.2d 274, 656 N.Y.S.2d 874, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quirk-v-sherry-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack