Quintz v. Quintz

3 N.C. 182
Superior Court of North Carolina·Decided May 15, 1802·Published

Opinion

JOHNSTON, Judge.

The report ought to state every tiling the reference directs. Here it has noi stated the several periods when the money was received, but only that it was received between such a day and such another day. Let it be referred again to make that statement.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quintz v. Quintz, 3 N.C. 182 (N.C. Ct. App. 1802).

3 N.C. 182 (Quintz v. Quintz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.