Quintos v. United States

Court of Claims

Quintos v. United States

124 Ct. Cl. 104, 1953 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 55, 1953 WL 6085

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedJanuary 13, 1953

DocketNo. 50220

StatusPublished

This text of 124 Ct. Cl. 104 (Quintos v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quintos v. United States, 124 Ct. Cl. 104, 1953 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 55, 1953 WL 6085 (cc 1953).

Pincite

Opinion

Howell, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs are citizens of the Republic of the Philippines and were citizens of the Commonwealth of the Philippines prior to the establishment of the Republic on July 4, 1946.

In their petition filed in this court on July 5, 1951, plaintiffs allege that prior to December 30, 1941, they had placed certain jewelry, coins and currency in the Philippine Na[105]*105tional Bank and that on December 30, 1941, their property was turned over to representatives of the defendant and was stored in vaults on Corregidor; that with the surrender of Corregidor, possession of the property passed over to the Japanese and while in their possession American prisoners of war stole the property.

Plaintiffs further allege that their efforts to have their claim administratively settled have been unsuccessful.

The defendant has moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations, 62 Stat. 976,28 U. S. C. (Supp. V) § 2501.

Under our decision in Marcos v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 641, plaintiffs had until September 2, 1951 to file their petition. It was filed on July 5, 1951, and hence is not barred by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.

It is so ordered.

Madden, Judge; Whitaker, Judge; Littleton, Judge; and Jones, Chief Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Howell, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court:

Plaintiffs are citizens of the Republic of the Philippines and were citizens of the Commonwealth of the Philippines prior to the establishment of the Republic on July 4, 1946.

In their petition filed in this court on July 5, 1951, plaintiffs allege that prior to December 30, 1941, they had placed certain jewelry, coins and currency in the Philippine Na[105]*105tional Bank and that on December 30, 1941, their property was turned over to representatives of the defendant and was stored in vaults on Corregidor; that with the surrender of Corregidor, possession of the property passed over to the Japanese and while in their possession American prisoners of war stole the property.

Plaintiffs further allege that their efforts to have their claim administratively settled have been unsuccessful.

The defendant has moved to dismiss the petition on the ground that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations, 62 Stat. 976,28 U. S. C. (Supp. V) § 2501.

Under our decision in Marcos v. United States, 122 C. Cls. 641, plaintiffs had until September 2, 1951 to file their petition. It was filed on July 5, 1951, and hence is not barred by the statute of limitations. Accordingly, the defendant’s motion to dismiss is denied.

It is so ordered.

Madden, Judge; Whitaker, Judge; Littleton, Judge; and Jones, Chief Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 Ct. Cl. 104, 1953 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 55, 1953 WL 6085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quintos-v-united-states-cc-1953.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack