Quinton Cox v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 19, 2016
Docket14-15-00684-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Quinton Cox v. State (Quinton Cox v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinton Cox v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

Continuing Abatement Order filed April 19, 2016

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-15-00684-CR ____________

QUINTON COX, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 434th Judicial District Court Fort Bend County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 13-DCR-064794

CONTINUING ABATEMENT ORDER

On February 5, 2016, this court directed the trial court to conduct a hearing in this case to determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to appointed counsel and a free record on appeal. Our order required the trial judge to see that a record of the hearing is made, make findings of fact and conclusions of law, and order the trial clerk to forward a record of the hearing and a supplemental clerk’s record containing the findings and conclusions. The transcribed record of the hearing and the courts findings and conclusions were to be filed with the clerk of this court on or before March 7, 2016. To date, the court has not received the record or findings.

The appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and removed from this court’s active docket. The appeal will be reinstated on this court’s active docket when the trial court’s findings and recommendations are filed in this court. The court will also consider an appropriate motion to reinstate the appeal filed by either party. It is the responsibility of any party seeking reinstatement to request a hearing date from the trial court and to schedule a hearing in compliance with this court’s order. If the parties do not request a hearing, the court coordinator of the trial court shall set a hearing date and notify the parties of such date.

It is so ORDERED.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Quinton Cox v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinton-cox-v-state-texapp-2016.