Quintero v. United States

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided December 19, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-01943·Unknown

Opinion

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Diana Quintero, individually, Case No. 2:22-cv-01943-GMN-NJK

Plaintiff, Order to Schedule

Settlement Conference and v. Stay Remaining Deadlines United States of America; Does I-V; and Does Corporations I-V, inclusive, Defendants. The parties respectfully request that the Court set this matter for a settlement conference and stay the remaining discovery deadlines. See LR 26-3; Volk v. D.A. Davidson & Co., 816 F.2d 1406, 1416–17 (9th Cir. 1987) (a district court has wide latitude in controlling discovery); Stern v. United States, 563 F. Supp. 484, 489 (D. Nev. 1983) (courts have the inherent power to stay causes on its docket to avoid duplicative litigation, inconsistent results, and waste of time and effort). This action arises under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”) for alleged injuries to Plaintiff arising from an October 14, 2020, car accident. The parties have completed discovery. The remaining deadlines are December 21, 2023, for dispositive motions and January 22, 2024, for the proposed joint pretrial order. Without waiver or binding admission against either party, the parties submit that it would conserve their resources, as well as those of the Court, if the settlement conference for this matter were held before dispositive motions, if any, and preparation of the proposed joint pretrial order. Additionally, defense counsel has responses to motions in other matters, including a motion for summary judgment, in December. Taking into accounts their schedules and obligations in other cases along with the sudicial holidays during the latter part of December, the parties propose that the Court set a settlement conference on or after January18,2024. February 5, 2024. If this case does not get resolved at the settlement conference, the parties agree to submit within 14 days thereafter a new, proposed schedule for dispositive motions and the proposed joint pretrial order. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation and thereafter issue a separate order setting the date, details, and requirements for the settlement conference. Respectfully submitted this 18th day of December 2023. JEREZ LAW, PLLC JASON M. FRIERSON United States Attorney /s/ Kristie L. Fischer /s/ Virginia T. Tomova KRISTIE L. FISCHER, Esq. VIRGINIA T. TOMOVA, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 11693 Assistant United States Attorney 4484 South Pecos Road, Suite 145 Attorney for Defendant Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 Telephone: (702) 941-7660 Attorney for Plaintiff IT IS SO ORDERED: Yo aA fon TATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DATED: December 19, 2023

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quintero v. United States, (D. Nev. 2023).

Quintero v. United States (Quintero v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stern v. United States
563 F. Supp. 484 (D. Nevada, 1983)
Volk v. D.A. Davidson & Co.
816 F.2d 1406 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)