Quinten Troy Schaefer v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: June 29, 2001
• Docket: 03-01-00305-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00305-CR

Quinten Troy Schaefer, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF CALDWELL COUNTY, 274TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 00-094, HONORABLE JACK H. ROBISON, JUDGE PRESIDING

PER CURIAM

Appellant Quinten Troy Schaefer pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravated sexual

assault. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2001). The district court adjudged him

guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for thirty years for each count, plus a $1000 fine for

count one, as called for in a plea bargain agreement. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal.

When a defendant pleads guilty to a felony and the punishment assessed does not

exceed that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appeal

must state that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect, or that the substance of the appeal was raised

by written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Tex.

R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Appellant’s notice of appeal does not comply with this rule and fails to confer

jurisdiction on this Court. Whitt v. State, No. 03-00-00194-CR (Tex. App.—Austin April 19, 2001,

no pet.); see also Cooper v. State, No. 1100-99, slip op. at 6-8 (Tex. Crim. App. April 4, 2001). The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction. 1

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: June 29, 2001

Do Not Publish

1 The record also contains a written waiver of appeal signed the day sentence was imposed. See Ex parte Dickey, 543 S.W.2d 99 (Tex. Crim. App. 1976); see also Hurd v. State, 548 S.W.2d 388 (Tex. Crim. App. 1977); Reed v. State, 516 S.W.2d 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974).