Quintanilla v. Arancini Bros. LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided October 5, 2022·No. 1:22-cv-01410·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wane eK JOSE QUINTANILLA, : Plaintiff, : : 22 Civ. 1410 (LGS) -against- : : ORDER ARANCINI BROS. LLC, et al., : Defendants. : □□□ LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: WHEREAS, on October 4, 2022, the Court was informed that the parties have reached a settlement agreement in principle. It is hereby ORDERED that, by October 25, 2022, the parties shall submit to the Court: (Z) the settlement agreement; and (ii) a joint letter with supporting evidence addressing the findings this Court must make in order to approve the settlement as fair and reasonable. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., 796 F.3d 199, 206 (2d Cir. 2015), cert. denied, 136 S. Ct. 824 (2016); Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc., 900 F. Supp. 2d 332, 335-36 (S.D.N.Y. 2012) (outlining factors district courts have used to determine whether a proposed settlement is fair and reasonable). It is further ORDERED that all conferences and trial are CANCELED. Dated: October 5, 2022 New York, New York .

LORNA G. SCHOFIEL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quintanilla v. Arancini Bros. LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Quintanilla v. Arancini Bros. LLC (Quintanilla v. Arancini Bros. LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.
796 F.3d 199 (Second Circuit, 2015)
Wolinsky v. Scholastic Inc.
900 F. Supp. 2d 332 (S.D. New York, 2012)