Quintana v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Quintana v. State

273 S.W. 604, 101 Tex. Crim. 47, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 649

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Quintana v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 Tex. Crim. 669 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 10, 1925·No. No. 9194.·Published

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. A special charge was requested and exception reserved to its refusal, but we have no way of appraising the applicability of the special charge. In the absence of the facts, it must be assumed that the court was correct in refusing the charge.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for felony theft, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The record contains neither statement of facts nor bills of exception. A special charge was requested and exception reserved to its refusal, but we have no way of appraising the applicability of the special charge. In the absence of the facts, it must be assumed that the court was correct in refusing the charge.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Quintana v. State, 273 S.W. 604, 101 Tex. Crim. 47, 1925 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 649 (Tex. 1925).

Pincite

273 S.W. 604 (Quintana v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.