Quintana v. Mei

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quintana v. Mei

254 A.D.2d 96, 679 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10684

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 13, 1998

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D.2d 96 (Quintana v. Mei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quintana v. Mei, 254 A.D.2d 96, 679 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Allen Saks, J.), entered January 17, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by defendants-appellants’ brief, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as that motion sought dismissal of plaintiffs claim for negligent snow and ice removal, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Since the record discloses the existence of factual issues respecting whether defendants, in the course of removing snow and ice accumulations on the public sidewalk abutting their residence, either created or heightened the hazard that is alleged to have caused plaintiffs fall and injury, defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Allen Saks, J.), entered January 17, 1997, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by defendants-appellants’ brief, denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as that motion sought dismissal of plaintiffs claim for negligent snow and ice removal, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Since the record discloses the existence of factual issues respecting whether defendants, in the course of removing snow and ice accumulations on the public sidewalk abutting their residence, either created or heightened the hazard that is alleged to have caused plaintiffs fall and injury, defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint was properly denied (see, Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324). Concur — Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D.2d 96, 679 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quintana-v-mei-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack