Quintana v. De La Luz Quintana

432 So. 2d 579, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27765
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 1983·No. No. AO-241·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The provision in the circuit court’s judgment that “In the event of the death of the Husband, alimony payments shall not terminate but shall be a charge against the husband’s estate” is erroneous and is by this judgment excised. O’Malley v. Pan American Bank of Orlando, N.A., 384 So.2d 1258 (Fla.1980). As modified the judgment of the circuit court is AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and SHIVERS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quintana v. De La Luz Quintana, 432 So. 2d 579, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 27765 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

432 So. 2d 579 (Quintana v. De La Luz Quintana) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Owen v. State
432 So. 2d 579 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)