Quintana v. Core Civic

CourtDistrict Court, D. New Mexico
DecidedMay 26, 2021
Docket1:18-cv-00233
StatusUnknown

This text of Quintana v. Core Civic (Quintana v. Core Civic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. New Mexico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quintana v. Core Civic, (D.N.M. 2021).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO PATRICK QUINTANA, Plaintiff,

vs. No. CIV 18-0233 JB/GJF CORE CIVIC (C.C.A.); BETTY JUDD; FNU LNU all of security staff; CENTURION L.L.C.; FNU LNU medical staff; FNU LNU medical staff; DENISE LNU medical staff nurse and FNU LNU all staff members,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

THIS MATTER comes before the Court on: (i) Plaintiff Patrick Quintana’s Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1983, filed March 9, 2018 (Doc. 1)(“Complaint”); and (ii) its Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed November 30, 2020 (Doc. 35)(“MOO”). In its MOO, the Court dismissed the Complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim and granted Quintana leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. See MOO at 1. Quintana has not filed an amended complaint within the time the Court permitted. The Court will therefore now dismiss the Complaint with prejudice and enter separate Final Judgment. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND When Quintana filed the Complaint, he was incarcerated at the Cibola County Correctional Facility in Grants, New Mexico. See Complaint at 1 (no paragraph numbering). The Complaint alleges: (i) “[t]here ha[ve] been many injuries to inmates by Centurion LLC Medical Staff and the record of their actions continues to grow not to mention their intentional (3) deaths from 9-20-17 to 11-18-17”; and (ii) “[a]ll of George Unit Staff along with Medical Staff are part of inmates intentional mistreatment by not allowing the proper medical procedures and medical treatments to be provided which also helped cause (3) deaths done by both Core Civic and [Centurion] LLC Medical Staffs,” Complaint ¶¶ A(2)-(3), at 1-2. In support of his individual claims, Quintana alleges that he is diabetic, that he had a hypoglycemic attack1 in his pod, and that Nurse Denise

gave him one-half of a tube of glucose, but Denise did not “C.B.G. with the glucose monitor and just left me to suffer.” Complaint ¶ B(1), at 2. Quintana alleges that Denise did not follow medical procedures, but instead followed the orders of Core Civic security staff members. See Complaint ¶ B(1), at 2. Quintana raises three counts in his Complaint: Count I. Medical Nurse (Denise) denied me proper medical treatment because she was order not to by Core Civic Security C.O.s Malicious & Callous indifference to inmates medical needs with “Evil intent”: They all need to be charged as “persons.” . . . Count II. Medical Staff was already well aware of my medical conditions/as the same with all of George Unit Staff Members/as the same with [Centurion] LLC l Medical Providers all staff members knowingly did wrong and need to be charged as “persons.” . . . Count III. All Staff members here at Core Civic are liable for (3) wrongful deaths and for trying to cover these deaths up Core Civic has been under the signature of C.C.A. for the last (40) years. Their death and injuries to inmates rate in the thousands and the courts are aware of many of these cases here in New Mexico alone (Grants) with all the same “persons.”

Complaint ¶¶ C(1)(A)-(C), at 3-4. In his prayer for relief, Quintana requests:

$1,800 a day for everyday I’ve spent here suffering under said circumstances. I want all Core Civic Staff Members charged tried and convicted to the fullest. $5,000 from each Core Civic Member for Malice and Callouse indifference actions/or inactions. [Centurion] Medical Staff to all be charged tried and convicted with all their li[c]enses barred never to work in the medical field to

1Hypoglycemia is the medical term for low blood sugar, and severe symptoms can result in severe cases may lead to seizures and loss of consciousness. See Melissa Conrad Stöppler, MD, Hypoglycemia, MedicineNet, https://www.medicinenet.com/hypoglycemia/article.htm (last visited May 25, 2021). hurt another human being.

Complaint ¶ E(1), at 5. In an attachment to the Complaint, Quintana alleges that his hypoglycemic event occurred on February 28, 2018, and that, when Denise began to administer the one-half tube of glucose, Quintana became verbally and physically uncooperative and abusive. See 2-28-18 Attachment at 7, filed March 9, 2018 (Doc 1)(“Attachment”). The Attachment states that, on March 1, 2018, when Quintana returned from “Workers Reck,” he was in the “pm med line” and, when he got his medications, he tried to speak to Nurse Denise and apologize for being rude during his hypoglycemic attack. Attachment at 7. In the Attachment, Quintana alleges that Denise told him that he is not diabetic and does not take insulin, and there was nothing wrong with him. See Attachment at 7. In the Attachment, Quintana alleges that Ms. Platero was on duty and was present when Denise told him there was nothing wrong with him. See Attachment at 7. Since the filing of his Complaint, Quintana has submitted sixteen supplements, appendices, notices, and letters. See Appendix/Supplement, filed April 24, 2018 (Doc. 8)(“Appendix/Supplement I”); Notice of Order of Cease and Desist, filed April 30, 2018 (Doc. 9),

Relief Appendix/Supplement, filed May 4, 2018 (Doc. 10); Appendix/Supplement, filed May 9, 2018 (Doc. 11)(“Appendix/Supplement II”); Accountant Representative Letter, filed May 21, 2018 (Doc. 12); Letter, filed May 25, 2018 (Doc. 14)(“Letter I”); Letter, filed June 4, 2018 (Doc. 15) (“Letter II”); Letter, filed June 13, 2018 (Doc. 17)(“Letter III”); Letter, filed June 22, 2018 (Doc. 18)(“Letter IV”); Notice of New Relief, filed July 2, 2018 (Doc. 19); Appendix/Supplement, filed August 1, 2018 (Doc. 21); Appendix/Supplement, filed August 21, 2018 (Doc. 23)(“Appendix/Supplement III”); Amendment Letter, filed October 10, 2018 (Doc. 26)(“Amendment Letter I”); Amendment Letter, filed October 12, 2018 (Doc. 27) (“Amendment Letter II”); Amendment Letter, filed October 26, 2018 (Doc. 28)(“Amendment Letter III”); Notice of Change of Address, filed November 16, 2018 (Doc. 30). In his subsequent filings, Quintana raises a variety of issues, including a claim that, on April 21, 2018, Platero was rude to him and, although he did get his medications, she attempted to make him leave without getting them, see Appendix/Supplement I at 1, and an allegation that a Dr. Deming is trying to wean him off of

glucose and he wants his medications restarted, see Notice of New Relief at 1-2. Last, Quintana also notified the Court that he is no longer incarcerated at the Cibola County Correctional Facility, in Grants, New Mexico but, instead, is now housed at the Guadalupe County Correctional Facility, Santa Rosa, New Mexico. See Notice of Change of Address at 1. Mail sent to Quintana at the Guadalupe County Correctional Facility has been returned as undeliverable. See Mail Returned as Undeliverable, filed December 29, 2020 (Doc. 36). Department of Corrections records indicate that Quintana has been released from custody and has not provided a current address. The Court issued its MOO and concluded: Quintana appears possibly to allege claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that his rights under the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution have been violated by alleged indifference to serious medical needs. See Complaint ¶¶ (A)-(C), at 1. Quintana has repeatedly supplemented his allegations with supplements, appendices, letters and notices. See Appendix/Supplement I; Notice of Order of Cease and Desist; Relief Appendix/Supplement; Appendix/Supplement II; Accountant Representative Letter; Letter I; Letter II; Letter III; Letter IV; Notice of New Relief; Appendix/Supplement III; Appendix/Supplement IV; Amendment Letter I; Amendment Letter II; Amendment Letter III.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carpenter v. Williams
86 F.3d 1015 (Tenth Circuit, 1996)
Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.
451 F.3d 1196 (Tenth Circuit, 2006)
Mann v. Boatright
477 F.3d 1140 (Tenth Circuit, 2007)
Ausherman v. Stump
643 F.2d 715 (Tenth Circuit, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Quintana v. Core Civic, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quintana-v-core-civic-nmd-2021.