Quintana v. C & R Foodland Corp.

736 So. 2d 129, 1999 WL 436562
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 30, 1999·No. No. 98-3167·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment in defendants’ favor. The record demonstrates that genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved regarding the conditions at the store at the time of the accident. See Ramos v. Wright Superior, Inc., 610 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther, 395 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Williams, 264 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Summary judgment was, therefore, improper.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quintana v. C & R Foodland Corp., 736 So. 2d 129, 1999 WL 436562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

736 So. 2d 129 (Quintana v. C & R Foodland Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther
395 So. 2d 244 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Williams
264 So. 2d 862 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Ramos v. Wright Superior, Inc.
610 So. 2d 46 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)