Quintana v. C & R Foodland Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Quintana v. C & R Foodland Corp.

736 So. 2d 129, 1999 WL 436562

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 30, 1999

DocketNo. 98-3167

StatusPublished

This text of 736 So. 2d 129 (Quintana v. C & R Foodland Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quintana v. C & R Foodland Corp., 736 So. 2d 129, 1999 WL 436562 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment in defendants’ favor. The record demonstrates that genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved regarding the conditions at the store at the time of the accident. See Ramos v. Wright Superior, Inc., 610 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther, 395 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Williams, 264 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Summary judgment was, therefore, improper.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the final summary judgment in defendants’ favor. The record demonstrates that genuine issues of material fact remain unresolved regarding the conditions at the store at the time of the accident. See Ramos v. Wright Superior, Inc., 610 So.2d 46 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Guenther, 395 So.2d 244 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Winn Dixie Stores, Inc. v. Williams, 264 So.2d 862 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972). Summary judgment was, therefore, improper.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

736 So. 2d 129, 1999 WL 436562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quintana-v-c-r-foodland-corp-fladistctapp-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack