Quintana v. Adams

Ninth Circuit

Quintana v. Adams

119 F. App'x 163

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 12, 2005

DocketNo. 02-56644

StatusPublished

This text of 119 F. App'x 163 (Quintana v. Adams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quintana v. Adams, 119 F. App'x 163 (9th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed December 3, 2003 is hereby AMENDED. The Clerk shall file the attached Amended Memorandum Disposition.

With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED. No subsequent petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed December 3, 2003 is hereby AMENDED. The Clerk shall file the attached Amended Memorandum Disposition.

With this amendment, the panel has voted unanimously to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc and no active judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing is DENIED and the suggestion for rehearing en banc is REJECTED. No subsequent petition for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

119 F. App'x 163, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quintana-v-adams-ca9-2005.