Quinonez (Brandon) v. State
This text of Quinonez (Brandon) v. State (Quinonez (Brandon) v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
BRANDON J. QUINONEZ, No. 69530 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. FILED MAR 04 2016 TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLER?F ‘"IPREME COURT
BY • - ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK
This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se appeal. Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge. Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for speedy trial. To the extent that appellant appeals from the district court order to produce prisoner, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order. Accordingly, we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.
Douglas
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
tO) 1947A e 1(, -07 0119 cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Brandon J. Quinonez Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk
(0) 1947A 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quinonez (Brandon) v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinonez-brandon-v-state-nev-2016.