Quinonez (Brandon) v. State

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

BRANDON J. QUINONEZ, No. 69530 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA,

Respondent.

FILED MAR 04 2016 TRACE K. LINDEMAN CLER?F ‘"IPREME COURT

BY • -

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL DEPUTY CLERK

This appeal was initiated by the filing of a pro se appeal.

Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County; David A. Hardy, Judge.

Our review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. The right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). No statute or court rule provides for an appeal from a district court order denying a motion for speedy trial. To the extent that appellant appeals from the district court order to produce prisoner, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from such an order. Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Douglas

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

tO) 1947A e 1(, -07 0119

2

cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Brandon J. Quinonez Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A