Quinones v. Thompson

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin
DecidedMay 19, 2021
Docket2:20-cv-00429
StatusUnknown

This text of Quinones v. Thompson (Quinones v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinones v. Thompson, (E.D. Wis. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

TYLER J. QUINONES,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 20-CV-429

TRACY THOMPSON et al.,

Defendants.

ORDER

Plaintiff Tyler J. Quinones, who is represented by counsel, filed an amended complaint on March 24, 2021. The defendants answered the amended complaint, (ECF No. 24), and moved to dismiss defendant Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution (KMCI). (ECF No. 24.) Quinones brings claims against KMCI under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 under a theory of “Monell” liability. While § 1983 allows only for a plaintiff to sue a “person”, who acting under the color of state law, violates his constitutional rights, Monell v. Dept. of Social Servs. of City of New York, 436 U.S. 658 (1978), creates limited circumstances where a plaintiff may sue a municipality. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(b) states that defendants in a federal lawsuit must have the legal capacity to be sued. State law determines an entity’s capacity to be sued. Webb v. Franklin County Jail, Case No. 160cv01284, 2017 WL 914736 at *2 (S.D. Ill. Mar. 8. 2017). Under Wisconsin law, KMCI is not a person, nor is it a separate legal entity

that can be sued under §1983. See Louis v. Milwaukee County Jail, No. 17-cv-113- wed-pp, 2017 WL 3037567 at *2 (E.D. Wis. July 18, 2017) (citing Powell v. Cook Cty. Jail, 814 F. Supp. 757, 758 N.D. Ill. 1993)). KMCI is part of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, which is a state agency. Claims against a state agency are “no different from a suit against the State itself,” so the court will construe the claims involving the DOC as claims against the State of Wisconsin. Will v. Mich.

Dep’t of State Police, 491 U.S. 58, 71 (1989) (Citing Graham 437 U.S. at 165-166; Monell, 436 U.S. at 690 n. 55). A state is not a “person” from whom a plaintiff can recover monetary damages under § 1983. Lapides v. Bd. of Regents of the Univ. Sys. Of Ga., 535 U.S. 613, 617 (2002); Williams v. Wisconsin, 336 F.3d 576, 580 (7th Cir. 2003). A State may be considered a “person” under § 1983 where a plaintiff seeks injunctive relief and alleges that the State itself is responsible for the violation of his constitutional

rights because of a practice, custom, or policy. Will, 491 U.S. at 71 n. 10; Graham, 473 U.S. at 166 (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 694). Quinones seeks only monetary damages. Accordingly, the court will grant the defendants’ motion to dismiss KMCI. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendants’ motion to dismiss Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution (ECF No. 25) is GRANTED. Kettle Moraine Correctional Institution is DISMISSED with prejudice.

2 Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 19th day of May, 2021.

BY THE COURT:

NANCY JOSEPH United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.
436 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1978)
Will v. Michigan Department of State Police
491 U.S. 58 (Supreme Court, 1989)
Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.
535 U.S. 613 (Supreme Court, 2002)
Gregory Williams v. State of Wisconsin
336 F.3d 576 (Seventh Circuit, 2003)
Powell v. Cook County Jail
814 F. Supp. 757 (N.D. Illinois, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Quinones v. Thompson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinones-v-thompson-wied-2021.