Quinones v. New England Motor Freight Inc.

80 A.D.3d 514, 915 N.Y.S.2d 72
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 20, 2011
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 80 A.D.3d 514 (Quinones v. New England Motor Freight Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinones v. New England Motor Freight Inc., 80 A.D.3d 514, 915 N.Y.S.2d 72 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

[515]*515Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered March 10, 2010, which granted defendants Pease’s and New England Motor Freight Inc.’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as to them, and order, same court and Justice, entered on or about March 25, 2010, which granted plaintiff’s motion for reargument, and upon reargument, adhered to its original determination, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff alleged she sustained personal injuries when her car struck a disabled vehicle after she was abruptly cut off by defendants’ tractor trailer on the highway.

Defendants met their burden of establishing prima facie entitlement to summary judgment by presenting evidence that defendants Pease and New England Motor Freight did not cause the accident. The burden then shifted to plaintiff, who failed to raise a triable issue of fact to defeat summary judgment (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562 [1980]; Silverman v Perlbinder, 307 AD2d 230, 231 [2003]) with her submission of a police accident report. The court properly disregarded the accident report, made by a police officer who was not an eyewitness, that contained several obvious inaccuracies and the hearsay statements of a defendant regarding the ultimate issues of fact (Figueroa v Luna, 281 AD2d 204, 205 [2001]).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them without merit. Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Friedman, Renwick and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Singh v. Stair
106 A.D.3d 632 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
BRADY, KIM M. v. CASILIO, PAT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Brady v. Casilio
93 A.D.3d 1190 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 A.D.3d 514, 915 N.Y.S.2d 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinones-v-new-england-motor-freight-inc-nyappdiv-2011.