Quinones v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Quinones v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority

219 A.D.2d 701, 631 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9584

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 25, 1995·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated June 7, 1993, which denied his motion, in effect, for reargument.

Motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not an appealable paper. By a decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 15, 1994, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, upon the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal; it is

Ordered that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Robinson v Laurent, 205 AD2d 517). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Graci, J.), dated June 7, 1993, which denied his motion, in effect, for reargument.

Motion by the respondents to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order appealed from is not an appealable paper. By a decision and order on motion of this Court dated September 15, 1994, the motion was held in abeyance and referred to the Justices hearing the appeal for determination upon the argument or submission of the appeal.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, upon the papers filed in opposition thereto, and upon the submission of the appeal; it is

Ordered that the motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

No appeal lies from an order denying reargument (see, Robinson v Laurent, 205 AD2d 517). Rosenblatt, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Hart, JJ., concur.

Quinones v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 219 A.D.2d 701, 631 N.Y.S.2d 538, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9584 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

219 A.D.2d 701 (Quinones v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related