Quinones v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review

452 A.2d 557, 69 Pa. Commw. 381, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1628
CourtCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 15, 1982
DocketAppeals, Nos. 2768 C.D. 1981, 2769 C.D. 1981 and 2770 C.D. 1981
StatusPublished

This text of 452 A.2d 557 (Quinones v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinones v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 452 A.2d 557, 69 Pa. Commw. 381, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1628 (Pa. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

OPINION by

President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,

Carlos Quinones1 appeals an Unemployment Compensation Board of Review order affirming a referee’s denial of benefits. We vacate and remand.

Quinones was a laborer at Nu-Econo-Brick. Because his work area was poorly heated, he was permitted to leave. Upon returning two days later, his job was gone.

The Employment Security Office found a voluntary quit and denied benefits under Section 402(b) of the Act.2 On appeal, the referee affirmed the denial but for a different reason of willful misconduct due to excessive absenteeism under Section 402(e).3 The Board affirmed the referee.4

[383]*383Quinones contends that he was awaiting recall. Neither the Board nor the referee considered this explanation for his absence.

In a willful misconduct ease, the employer has the burden of proving misconduct. Wing v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, Pa. , , 436 A.2d 179, 181 (1981).

The question of whether a claimant voluntarily quit or was fired is one of law '.subject .to our review, Wing, as is his burden of rebutting the quit finding. O’Donnell v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 66 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 105, , 443 A.2d 864, 865 (1982). There is insufficient evidence for us to make.that legal determination. We will not infer from the absence of findings on a relevant issue that the issue was resolved against a claimant.

Vacated and remanded.

Order

The Unemployment Compensation Board of Review Orders, Nos. B-200356, B-200357 and B-200358, all dated October 20, 1981, are vacated and the cases are remanded to the Board for the making of new and adequate fact finding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wing v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
436 A.2d 179 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1981)
O'Donnel v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
443 A.2d 864 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
452 A.2d 557, 69 Pa. Commw. 381, 1982 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 1628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinones-v-commonwealth-unemployment-compensation-board-of-review-pacommwct-1982.