Quinnteris D Bussie v. State of Florida

263 So. 3d 229
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 22, 2019
Docket17-1803
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 So. 3d 229 (Quinnteris D Bussie v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Quinnteris D Bussie v. State of Florida, 263 So. 3d 229 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-1803 _____________________________

QUINNTERIS D BUSSIE,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Leon County. James C. Hankinson, Judge.

January 22, 2019

PER CURIAM.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant’s probation and the resulting sentence, but remand for the trial court to enter a corrected written order specifying that the Appellant only admitted violating the conditions of probation as alleged in the affidavit of violation of probation. See Altman v. State, 252 So. 3d 426, 426 (Fla. 1st DCA 2018) (citing to Margolis v. State, 148 So. 3d 532, 532 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (affirming revocation of probation and resulting sentence, but remanding for entry of corrected revocation order of listing only the conditions of probation to which the defendant admitted); Narvaez v. State, 674 So. 2d 868, 869 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996) (noting that written order of revocation must comport with oral pronouncement, and remanding with instructions to strike from the order violations neither admitted to nor found by the court). Appellant need not be present for this correction.

AFFIRMED, but REMANDED for correction.

WOLF, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________

Candice K. Brower, Criminal Conflict & Civil Regional Counsel, and Michael J. Titus, Assistant Regional Conflict Counsel, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Brooke Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clifton D. Ephron v. State of Florida
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
263 So. 3d 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinnteris-d-bussie-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2019.