Quinn v. Wright State University

District Court, S.D. Ohio·Decided February 26, 2020·No. 3:20-cv-00057·Unknown

Opinion

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

EVELYN QUINN, : Case No. 3:20-cv-00057 : Plaintiff, : District Judge Douglas R. Cole : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington vs. : : WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., : Defendants. : :

ORDER U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE DEFENDANTS WITH PROCESS

The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case is before the Court for initial review of Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court may dismiss a Complaint upon finding (1) it advances frivolous or malicious claims; (2) it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). Having conducted this initial review, the Court finds that dismissal under § 1915(e) is not warranted at this stage of the litigation. The U.S. Marshal is ORDERED to serve Defendants with process. IT IS SO ORDERED.

February 26, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Quinn v. Wright State University, (S.D. Ohio 2020).

Quinn v. Wright State University (Quinn v. Wright State University) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neitzke v. Williams
490 U.S. 319 (Supreme Court, 1989)