Quinn v. Wright State University
This text of Quinn v. Wright State University (Quinn v. Wright State University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Ohio primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON
EVELYN QUINN, : Case No. 3:20-cv-00057 : Plaintiff, : District Judge Douglas R. Cole : Magistrate Judge Sharon L. Ovington vs. : : WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY, et al., : Defendants. : :
ORDER U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE DEFENDANTS WITH PROCESS
The Court previously granted Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. This case is before the Court for initial review of Plaintiff’s pro se Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B), the Court may dismiss a Complaint upon finding (1) it advances frivolous or malicious claims; (2) it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (3) it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). Having conducted this initial review, the Court finds that dismissal under § 1915(e) is not warranted at this stage of the litigation. The U.S. Marshal is ORDERED to serve Defendants with process. IT IS SO ORDERED.
February 26, 2020 s/Sharon L. Ovington Sharon L. Ovington United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Quinn v. Wright State University, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-wright-state-university-ohsd-2020.