Quinn v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Quinn v. United States

92 F.2d 1013, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4826

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 2, 1937

DocketNo. 7617

StatusPublished

This text of 92 F.2d 1013 (Quinn v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quinn v. United States, 92 F.2d 1013, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4826 (6th Cir. 1937).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the conviction of appellant upon counts 1, 3, and 5 of the indictment, that the punishment was no more than could have been imposed upon any single count, and that it is therefore unnecessary to consider whether error was committed in overruling the demurrer and motion to quash count 2 because such error, if any, would not be prejudicial, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Judgment of the District Court be and is in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It appearing that there was substantial evidence to support the conviction of appellant upon counts 1, 3, and 5 of the indictment, that the punishment was no more than could have been imposed upon any single count, and that it is therefore unnecessary to consider whether error was committed in overruling the demurrer and motion to quash count 2 because such error, if any, would not be prejudicial, it is therefore ordered and adjudged that the Judgment of the District Court be and is in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

92 F.2d 1013, 1937 U.S. App. LEXIS 4826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-united-states-ca6-1937.