Quinn v. State
30 N.E. 300, 130 Ind. 340, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 346
Opinion
The judgment in this ease must be reversed. The trial judge directed the bailiff to go into the jury room and give the jury instructions as to the return of their verdict. He also directed that the verdict should be received by an attorney of the court, but did not appoint him a special judge.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Quinn v. State, 30 N.E. 300, 130 Ind. 340, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 346 (Ind. 1892).
30 N.E. 300 (Quinn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Decker v. State
386 N.E.2d 192 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1979)
Purdy v. State
369 N.E.2d 633 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1977)
Deming v. State
133 N.E.2d 51 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1956)
People v. Little
9 N.W.2d 683 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1943)
State, Ex Rel. Eggers v. Branaman
183 N.E. 653 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1932)
Straw v. State
149 N.E. 430 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1925)
Coolman v. State
72 N.E. 568 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1904)
French v. Seamans
50 N.Y.S. 776 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)