Quinn v. State
Opinion
On November 8,1976 appellant, Mancel Paul Quinn entered a plea of guilty to the offense of burglary and received a five-year sentence. On September 16, 1977, appellant filed a "Writ of Error Coram Nobis” seeking to [430]*430set aside his sentence on the ground that the state had not fulfilled its obligation under a plea agreement. Quinn appeals the denial of this writ.
Although appellant in his pro se appeal has incorrectly sought relief through the use of a "Writ of Coram Nobis,” Waye v. State, 239 Ga. 871 (238 SE2d 923) (1977), we have reviewed his single allegation that his sentence has not been correctly implemented and affirm. A review of appellant’s plea transcript discloses that he was told to expect a sentence of five years which could be served concurrently with a previously imposed Alabama sentence. Appellant was also told that the trial court was not bound by any pre-sentence promises and could impose the maximum sentence of twenty years. Appellant received the five-year concurrent sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
249 S.E.2d 232 (Quinn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.