Quinn v. State
This text of 249 S.E.2d 232 (Quinn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On November 8,1976 appellant, Mancel Paul Quinn entered a plea of guilty to the offense of burglary and received a five-year sentence. On September 16, 1977, appellant filed a "Writ of Error Coram Nobis” seeking to [430]*430set aside his sentence on the ground that the state had not fulfilled its obligation under a plea agreement. Quinn appeals the denial of this writ.
Although appellant in his pro se appeal has incorrectly sought relief through the use of a "Writ of Coram Nobis,” Waye v. State, 239 Ga. 871 (238 SE2d 923) (1977), we have reviewed his single allegation that his sentence has not been correctly implemented and affirm. A review of appellant’s plea transcript discloses that he was told to expect a sentence of five years which could be served concurrently with a previously imposed Alabama sentence. Appellant was also told that the trial court was not bound by any pre-sentence promises and could impose the maximum sentence of twenty years. Appellant received the five-year concurrent sentence.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
249 S.E.2d 232, 242 Ga. 429, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 1239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-state-ga-1978.