Quinn v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Quinn v. State

103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 693

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 17, 1925

Docket8 Div. 240.

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 926 (Quinn v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Quinn v. State, 103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 693 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The constituent elements of the crime charged have so often been declared as to render further declaration unnecessary. See Karackalas v. State, 38 Ala. App. 181, 89 So. 833; Jordan v State, 17 Ala. App. 575, 87 So. 433; Canellos v. State, 17 Ala. App. 278, 84 So. 396. There is no sufficient evidence in this ease to prove that the property was in fact stolen, or, if so, that defendant bought it with a guilty knowledge. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and for the failure of the trial court to give this charge as requested the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMEORD, J.

The constituent elements of the crime charged have so often been declared as to render further declaration unnecessary. See Karackalas v. State, 38 Ala. App. 181, 89 So. 833; Jordan v State, 17 Ala. App. 575, 87 So. 433; Canellos v. State, 17 Ala. App. 278, 84 So. 396. There is no sufficient evidence in this ease to prove that the property was in fact stolen, or, if so, that defendant bought it with a guilty knowledge. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and for the failure of the trial court to give this charge as requested the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/quinn-v-state-alactapp-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack