Quinn v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Quinn v. State

103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 693

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Quinn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 21 Ala. App. 459 →

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 1925·No. 8 Div. 240.·Published

Opinion

SAMEORD, J.

The constituent elements of the crime charged have so often been declared as to render further declaration unnecessary. See Karackalas v. State, 38 Ala. App. 181, 89 So. 833; Jordan v State, 17 Ala. App. 575, 87 So. 433; Canellos v. State, 17 Ala. App. 278, 84 So. 396. There is no sufficient evidence in this ease to prove that the property was in fact stolen, or, if so, that defendant bought it with a guilty knowledge. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and for the failure of the trial court to give this charge as requested the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMEORD, J.

The constituent elements of the crime charged have so often been declared as to render further declaration unnecessary. See Karackalas v. State, 38 Ala. App. 181, 89 So. 833; Jordan v State, 17 Ala. App. 575, 87 So. 433; Canellos v. State, 17 Ala. App. 278, 84 So. 396. There is no sufficient evidence in this ease to prove that the property was in fact stolen, or, if so, that defendant bought it with a guilty knowledge. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and for the failure of the trial court to give this charge as requested the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded. Reversed and remanded.

Quinn v. State, 103 So. 926, 20 Ala. App. 693 (Ala. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

103 So. 926 (Quinn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related